Category Archives: Uncategorized

Interview with Alexandra Kudukis:

http://www.iamlietuva.com/923-2/

 

Interview with Alexandra Kudukis:

 

Alex: Hello Grant, thank you for speaking to me today. Your recent article in the Jerusalem Report magazine  – https://ggochin.wordpress.com/2017/11/27/jerusalem-report-article-11-29-17-dated-december-7-title-defective-heroes/ – has caused quite a stir. Various segments of the Lithuanian government and society have called you an “agent of the East,” a “Kremlin puppet,” a “useful idiot for Putin,” and other such descriptions.

 

Grant: Such ad hominem assertions reveal the utter absurdity of the Lithuanian government’s position on these matters.  No matter how small an issue, everything is dismissively ascribed to Russia so that the government need not take responsibility for historical truth. It used to be that Jews were the ultimate source of blame, but now that Lithuania has virtually no Jews remaining, all ills are attributed to the Russians.

 

In America and, frankly, in all Western democracies, people acknowledge problems and actively seek solutions.  By contrast, in Lithuania, it would seem the Government’s response is to say: “We have a problem, let’s find a way to ignore it or blame an external party.” You cannot fix a country’s problems that way, especially with the whole world watching. The outside world has long been aware of how Lithuania’s Jews were murdered in 1941 and that this preceded the January 1942 Wannsee Conference, when Nazi Germany decided to make mass-murder its state policy.

 

The Lithuanian government’s continued efforts to deny the truth – and to blame the messengers of truth – reflect negatively on the country, not on the messenger.  Germany and Austria, which have honestly and thoroughly confronted the past, would never consider a monument honoring anyone who planned, promoted, or implemented the Holocaust.  Lithuania’s excuses for continuing to honor war-crimes perpetrators simply make the country look ridiculous in the eyes of the world.

 

Alex: But aren’t Russians to blame for some things in Lithuania?:

 

Grant: Without a doubt, the Russians ended Lithuanian independence, imposed collectivization, and sent “enemies” to the gulags.  But that doesn’t explain how or why 95% of Lithuania’s Jewish citizens were murdered in 1941, at a time when even the Germans, who had occupied Poland since September 1939, had no such policy.  Nor can Russian actions against Lithuania be grounds for refusing to look at the root causes of the only genocide that occurred in Lithuania during the Second World War.

 

Alex:  The Lithuanian government has not released a list of Holocaust perpetrators.  Recently, the government has said that instead of official investigations and determinations, the matter should be left to historians.  What do you think?

 

Grant:  I come from South Africa, where Apartheid governments long covered up state-sponsored crimes against part of the country’s population.  The negative perception of the country was only changed after a truth and reconciliation process that was objectively open, thorough, and honest.  Today, South Africa is now able to attract political allies and foreign investment.  Other countries have also used this model to try to salve deep wounds from atrocious internal human-rights violations.  If a government’s efforts are sincere and credibly acknowledge the truth, the outcome can enormously help a country lay the foundation for growth.

 

Alex: Your efforts for the past many years have focused on the monuments and honors given to Holocaust perpetrators.  Since the monuments remain, do you see your efforts as being successful?

 

Grant: These honors do remain.  However, the honors symbolize Lithuania’s official posture of enforced ignorance about the true nature of the Holocaust.  From my efforts, people in Lithuania are learning the history of their country that is officially denied or obfuscated.  Lithuanians increasingly recognize that those who are glorified as their national heroes are some of the worst monsters in the history of the world. While the Lithuanian government persists in embracing a false narrative, the population is increasingly asking questions.  And from examining original source materials written contemporaneously by Lithuanian leaders themselves Lithuanians are learning what successive governments have concealed, namely, that the acts of these monsters is not fiction invented by Russians, Poles, Jews, Americans, or Martians.  In this regard, they are following the suggestion made more than 15 years ago by Prof. Saulius Suziedelis, who urged anyone who doubted the plans and actions of the Lithuanian leaders in 1940 and 1941 to go to the Lithuanian archives and read the material themselves. He also recognized, however, that “some will continue to live in the never-never land of denial and fantasy, charging that these negative traits … are based on Communist fabrications.” (“The Burden of 1941,” fn. 4). As is clear, a succession of Lithuanian governments have continued to live in that “never-never land”.

 

Despite my efforts to ask the government to acknowledge facts readily found in Lithuania’s archives, no action has been taken by any political leader to alter the status quo, and the inaction of officials has been ratified by Lithuanian courts, effectively endorsing the honoring of monsters.  This reveals Lithuania’s national values, in excruciating detail. Lithuania’s modern leaders, such as President Grybauskaite, Genocide Centre Chair Burauskaite, and Vilnius Mayor Simasius, cannot plausibly claim ignorance of the facts as an excuse for maintaining the status quo of honoring the murderers of her own citizens.  They will be remembered as those who steadfastly sought to shore up the dubious reputations of Skirpa, Noreika, and others.

 

Alex: Are you condemning an entire generation of Lithuanians?

 

Grant. Youth is traditionally idealistic. The youth in every civilized country are taught to think and question. In Lithuania, the youth are also taught to fear a wide variety of people collectively called “foreigners.”  This generation has been told that Russians are to be considered at the top of the “foreign” list of enemies and, therefore, that anything negative said about Lithuania must originate in Russian lies. However, Lithuanian youth are also inquisitive.  When they leave Lithuania’s information “bubble” looking for jobs and to make friends in places such as Berlin, London, or New York, they are taken aback by the stares they receive when they mention the name of their native country.  They do not get those all-too-familiar stares because of me, or Russians, or other “usual suspects” used to deflect blame.  They get the stares because the Lithuanian government has created the appearance that Lithuanians are Holocaust distorters.

 

Another attack critics launch against me is to call me a “Lithuanian hater”. That is equally absurd. My family have lived in Lithuania for 700 years, we are Lithuanian citizens. It is often said that dissent is the highest form of patriotism. If we love our country, and I do, it is our patriotic OBLIGATION to point out defects and improve the situation.

 

Given the dozens of cemeteries I have restored in Lithuania, given my charitable giving there, my very many trips to Lithuania, and the many friends I have there, I feel very at home in my homeland of Lithuania. I am firmly Lithuanian and proud of it.

 

Alex: You have frequently criticized Teresa Burauskaite, who has been the director general of the Genocide Center since 2009.

 

Grant:  The extreme contortions she has used to deny the active role of Lithuanians in the murder of nearly all of its Jewish citizens have reinforced the view that the Genocide Center is not designed to make informed, fact-based determinations.  For example, she took the position that the leader of the guards at a concentration camp could not have known what was going on in the camp.  Her pronouncements are then cited by others in government to create a pretext for denying the truth.  Given her lengthy tenure and the reliance officially placed upon her positions, it is clear that the Genocide Center is a cynical political ruse.  No Westerner finds her credible because she has forsaken her ostensible role as a fact-finder to become the chief defense counsel for murderers, advancing on their behalf spurious, ideologically based theories to distort facts.   And, when all else fails, when facts are undeniable, she will assert that they facts were Russian inventions. To her credit, however, she has confessed that her findings are not factual but rather the product of political pressure – which, by the way, is a vintage Soviet strategy.  For her service, certain hard-line elements in Lithuania may hail Burauskaite as a national hero, much like South Africa’s Verwoed, Zimbabwe’s Mugabe, and Colombia’s Chavez have enjoyed support from “hard-line” elements in their respective countries.  But history is not on Burauskaite’s side.  Her statements simply remind the world that officially Lithuania still has not come to terms with its past.

 

Alex: What is your next step?

 

Grant: The record is established – despite facts found in its own archives, the Lithuanian government knowingly and openly considers Jew murderers as their national heroes. Again, the persistence of the monuments and of street names honoring the architects of the Holocaust must be understood to symbolize something greater – the national values of modern Lithuania.

 

I have been able to get the Seimas Ombudsman on record, the President, Prime Minister, Mayor Simasius and multiple levels of government. The public record shows that they were aware of the distortions at the Genocide Center, and they were aware of the honoring of monsters and they chose to protect the monuments and Burauskaite over truth and national dignity. One day, when the monuments eventually do come down, people like Simasius will try to claim it was his doing. President Grybauskaite might try to claim that she was seeking national reconciliation, but, the public paper trail of their positions exist. They have written their own record that future historians will be able to research.

 

Lithuania’s officialdom realizes the harm they do to the country’s reputation and soul, and have chosen to continue it in the face of public disclosure. They therefore own the problem, now and in the future.  The moral bankruptcy is clear for the world to see.  Lithuania has to find a path forward. I would like to help Lithuania move forward but first Lithuania must be willing to acknowledge its past, honestly, openly, and comprehensively.  That is why I believe that Lithuania ultimately must have a credible truth and reconciliation process.

 

Alex: Are you going to continue your efforts?

 

Grant.  Despite the official condemnations and maneuvers used to discredit what I have said, it is clear from hundreds of e-mails and social media messages that ethnic Lithuanians in Lithuania and around the world want to learn the truth and, among other things, are becoming uncomfortable with the continued honors bestowed upon the monsters.  I have great hope for the Lithuanian people, most of whom do not believe the Holocaust participants reflected Lithuanian values. I will continue trying to educate.  I look forward to a new day in which a new Lithuanian government recognizes that the nation’s best interest lies in a credible and complete examination of the events of 1941.

 

Alex: Thank you, we will watch your future activity with interest.

 

Grant Gochin is a Wealth Advisor in Los Angeles. He may be reached at grant.gochin@raymondjames.com

 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Defective Heroes

http://www.jpost.com/International/Why-is-Lithuania-honoring-perpetrators-of-the-Holocaust-515502

Defective Heroes

Grant Arthur Gochin

Defective heroes abound. Currently, in Lithuania, evil is on display.

Prior to 1915, (for approximately 700 years), Jews lived in Lithuanian territories and enjoyed relative peace. After a Russian expulsion of Jews, independent Lithuania realized their loss of human resources and invited economically active Jews to return to Lithuania, with promises of autonomous communities and full equal rights. This honeymoon period lasted until 1924, when Lithuania abolished their post of “Minister without a Portfolio for Jewish Affairs”.

After a coup in 1926 the Lithuanian Voldemarist movement arose, it conflated Jew hate with Lithuanian patriotism. A subsequent Jew hate movement arose called Verslas, so that, by the 1940s, Jew hate and Lithuanian patriotism were synonymous in many circles. Protectionism was legislated to suppress Jewish businesses, Jews were denied Civil Service jobs and were limited in University enrollment.

Lithuanian pogroms against Jews began prior to the arrival of Nazis; Lithuanians actively participated in the slaughter of their Jewish neighbors and joyously reaped the economic benefits of looting.

Lithuania’s Jewish population did not survive the Nazi occupation. Estimates reflect that 23,000 Lithuanians actively participated in persecuting their Jewish neighbors, and hundreds of thousands participated in the sharing of Jewish loot. Since Lithuania regained independence in 1990, not a single perpetrator has been brought to justice by the Lithuanian Government, rather, just the opposite: noted perpetrators have been transformed into revered heroes.

For example, Kazys Skirpa, the Lithuanian representative to Germany, who first proposed ethnic cleansing of Jews to Hitler, and one of the architects of the Holocaust, is celebrated with streets named in his honor in two major Lithuanian cities. Mayor Simasius of Vilnius says Skirpa raised the flag of independence on Castle Hill in 1919, Simasius has not shown much inclination in removing Skirpa’s street name. Skirpa’s Jewish victims are clearly inconsequential. The same position was articulated on October 10, 2017 on Lithuanian National TV by Conservative MP Laurynas Kasciunas, who said Skirpa simply “miscalculated” in his attempt to curry favor with Nazi Germany by advocating for ethnic cleansing of Lithuania’s Jews.

In 2012, Juozas Ambrazevicius Brazaitis, who was Prime Minister of the interim Lithuanian Government that promoted the persecution of Jews, was re-buried in Lithuania with full State Honors, despite his claims that Jews should not be murdered so publicly. Apparently, murdering Jews more privately was preferable. Brazaitis was also editor of a newspaper “I Laisve” which equated Jews and Bolsheviks, which provided justification for the slaughter of all Jews, including Jewish babies. This slander is still in existence in current Lithuania.

The grave of the genocidal murderer, Bronius Norkus, is considered a national cultural monument because, in 1941, he posted a flag on a hill at the Resurrection Church in Kaunas. No mention is made of the tens of thousands of Jews he butchered. Many other examples of defective honors also exist.

Currently, a monument to Jonas Noreika is affixed to the front the Vrublevski Library of the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences in Vilnius. Noreika ordered the detention and concentration of the Jews from several communities, in addition to the plunder of their possessions. Despite the fact that no installation permit was issued, the monument was erected. Protests and appeals to the Mayor of Vilnius have been met with evasive and dismissive responses. He declined responsibility and deferred the matter to the Library‘s management. The Library in turn, declined to act. An appeal for action was then submitted to the Heritage Department, who owns the building.

Mayor Simasius referred the question of Noreika’s guilt to Lithuania‘s misnamed, “Genocide Center”. This center has repeatedly demonstrated that no amount of proof of culpability will be sufficient for them to condemn a Lithuanian Holocaust perpetrator.

An appeal to Lithuanian President Grybauskaite followed. She claimed that her office checked with the Genocide Center, the Lithuanian Supreme Court, and the Lithuanian State Security Department and there were no concerns with honoring Noreika. A follow-up request to the President was met with the response that investigating the war crimes of Noreika was beyond the jurisdiction of her office — the chief executive officer in Lithuania. She claims that she sincerely cares about the Holocaust.

An appeal to the legislative branch of the government was also politely sidestepped. An inquiry made to the Ombudsman of the Lithuanian Seimas (Parliament) was again referred back to the Genocide Center, which declared on Noreika‘s behalf, the infamous Nuremberg Defense asserted by Nazi war criminal Eichmann – “I was only following orders“. That Nuremberg Defense was rejected by the War Crimes Tribunal then; in Lithuania, it remains as an acceptable defense.

After the failure of legal and moral appeals to the executive and legislative branches of government, a new appeal was lodged against the Noreika monument focusing on aesthetic values, rather than on human values. The Lithuanian Department of Cultural Heritage has specific aesthetic criteria for monuments, a request for review was submitted and denied.

A legal suit was filed in order to determine if the Heritage Departments’ refusal was lawful. This suit was rejected on a technicality by the Court, and declined. The declination was appealed to the Lithuanian Supreme Administrative Court who overruled the lower Court and returned the case for reconsideration. The lower court then found a new technicality in order to dismiss the case once again. The ridiculousness of the tossing of the case back and forth between Courts created a purposeless vacuum.

Lower-level Lithuanian courts have historically demonstrated a lack of independence and susceptibility to political pressure. Therefore, the monument remains, with MPs like Kasciunas defending it. Apparently, patriotism washes away the stain of Holocaust perpetration.

Fundamental to any democracy is an honest and thorough examination of its past. Lithuanian politicians strive to keep the population in a perpetual state of fear. Their pervasive method is a possible impending Russian invasion (Russian mischief making in the Baltics is a genuine concern). Dissention from their ideological orthodoxy is labeled a Russian plot. They see no reason for self-examination, therefore, questioning the honoring of Holocaust perpetrators constitutes opposing the ideological state. Public support for Soviet or Nazi crimes against Lithuania is criminalized, however, support for Lithuanian Holocaust perpetrators is applauded.

A recent example is Dr. Darius Udrys, a Lithuanian-American currently living in Vilnius. Udrys is outspoken in his criticism of Lithuanian officials who honor Nazi collaborators and war criminals. He has proven to be a continual irritant to Lithuania’s historical revisionists. In a recent online discussion, Udrys questioned the propriety of the killing of civilians during Lithuania’s partisan war against the Soviets, and as a result, was forced out of his position as head of the city’s development agency. His ousting was preceded by a public slander campaign led by a Vilnius City Councilmember Adomas Buzinskas and his ideological colleagues. An appeal for redress was presented to the City’s Ethics Commission, who ruled against Udrys, claiming that the slanderer was simply being “patriotic”.

Patriotism and honoring of Lithuanian Holocaust perpetrators have become synonymous, as was Jew hate and patriotism in the late 1930s.

Lithuania‘s problems with truth will continue to plague it. These problems shock and dismay the Western world, the very bodies that Lithuania hopes will accept them as an equal nation, and come to their defense in the event of a Russian invasion.

Grant Gochin is a Wealth Advisor in Los Angeles. He may be reached at grant.gochin@raymondjames.com

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Defective Heroes

JRep – December 11 06-07Commentary

http://www.jpost.com/International/Why-is-Lithuania-honoring-perpetrators-of-the-Holocaust-515502

Jerusalem Report Article,  publish date:  December 11, 2017.
Volume XXVIII No. 18, pages 6 & 7.

Defective Heroes

Grant Arthur Gochin

Defective heroes abound. Currently, in Lithuania, evil is on display.

Prior to 1915, (for approximately 700 years), Jews lived in Lithuanian territories and enjoyed relative peace. After a Russian expulsion of Jews, independent Lithuania realized their loss of human resources and invited economically active Jews to return to Lithuania, with promises of autonomous communities and full equal rights. This honeymoon period lasted until 1924, when Lithuania abolished their post of “Minister without a Portfolio for Jewish Affairs”.

After a coup in 1926 the Lithuanian Voldemarist movement arose, it conflated Jew hate with Lithuanian patriotism. A subsequent Jew hate movement arose called Verslas, so that, by the 1940s, Jew hate and Lithuanian patriotism were synonymous in many circles. Protectionism was legislated to suppress Jewish businesses, Jews were denied Civil Service jobs and were limited in University enrollment.

Lithuanian pogroms against Jews began prior to the arrival of Nazis; Lithuanians actively participated in the slaughter of their Jewish neighbors and joyously reaped the economic benefits of looting.

Lithuania’s Jewish population did not survive the Nazi occupation. Estimates reflect that 23,000 Lithuanians actively participated in persecuting their Jewish neighbors, and hundreds of thousands participated in the sharing of Jewish loot. Since Lithuania regained independence in 1990, not a single perpetrator has been brought to justice by the Lithuanian Government, rather, just the opposite: noted perpetrators have been transformed into revered heroes.

For example, Kazys Skirpa, the Lithuanian representative to Germany, who first proposed ethnic cleansing of Jews to Hitler, and one of the architects of the Holocaust, is celebrated with streets named in his honor in two major Lithuanian cities. Mayor Simasius of Vilnius says Skirpa raised the flag of independence on Castle Hill in 1919, Simasius has not shown much inclination in removing Skirpa’s street name. Skirpa’s Jewish victims are clearly inconsequential. The same position was articulated on October 10, 2017 on Lithuanian National TV by Conservative MP Laurynas Kasciunas, who said Skirpa simply “miscalculated” in his attempt to curry favor with Nazi Germany by advocating for ethnic cleansing of Lithuania’s Jews.

In 2012, Juozas Ambrazevicius Brazaitis, who was Prime Minister of the interim Lithuanian Government that promoted the persecution of Jews, was re-buried in Lithuania with full State Honors, despite his claims that Jews should not be murdered so publicly. Apparently, murdering Jews more privately was preferable. Brazaitis was also editor of a newspaper “I Laisve” which equated Jews and Bolsheviks, which provided justification for the slaughter of all Jews, including Jewish babies. This slander is still in existence in current Lithuania. The grave of the genocidal murderer, Bronius Norkus, is considered a national cultural monument because, in 1941, he posted a flag on a hill at the Resurrection Church in Kaunas. No mention is made of the tens of thousands of Jews he butchered. Many other examples of defective honors also exist.

Currently, a monument to Jonas Noreika is affixed to the front the Vrublevski Library of the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences in Vilnius. Noreika ordered the detention and concentration of the Jews from several communities, in addition to the plunder of their possessions. Despite the fact that no installation permit was issued, the monument was erected. Protests and appeals to the Mayor of Vilnius have been met with evasive and dismissive responses. He declined responsibility and deferred the matter to the Library‘s management. The Library in turn, declined to act. An appeal for action was then submitted to the Heritage Department, who owns the building.

Mayor Simasius referred the question of Noreika’s guilt to Lithuania‘s misnamed, “Genocide Center”. This center has repeatedly demonstrated that no amount of proof of culpability will be sufficient for them to condemn a Lithuanian Holocaust perpetrator.

An appeal to Lithuanian President Grybauskaite followed. She claimed that her office checked with the Genocide Center, the Lithuanian Supreme Court, and the Lithuanian State Security Department and there were no concerns with honoring Noreika. A follow-up request to the President was met with the response that investigating the war crimes of Noreika was beyond the jurisdiction of her office — the chief executive officer in Lithuania. She claims that she sincerely cares about the Holocaust.

An appeal to the legislative branch of the government was also politely sidestepped. An inquiry made to the Ombudsman of the Lithuanian Seimas (Parliament) was again referred back to the Genocide Center, which declared on Noreika‘s behalf, the infamous Nuremberg Defense asserted by Nazi war criminal Eichmann – “I was only following orders“. That Nuremberg Defense was rejected by the War Crimes Tribunal then; in Lithuania, it remains as an acceptable defense.

After the failure of legal and moral appeals to the executive and legislative branches of government, a new appeal was lodged against the Noreika monument focusing on aesthetic values, rather than on human values. The Lithuanian Department of Cultural Heritage has specific aesthetic criteria for monuments, a request for review was submitted and denied.

A legal suit was filed in order to determine if the Heritage Departments’ refusal was lawful. This suit was rejected on a technicality by the Court, and declined. The declination was appealed to the Lithuanian Supreme Administrative Court who overruled the lower Court and returned the case for reconsideration. The lower court then found a new technicality in order to dismiss the case once again. The ridiculousness of the tossing of the case back and forth between Courts created a purposeless vacuum.

 

Lower-level Lithuanian courts have historically demonstrated a lack of independence and susceptibility to political pressure. Therefore, the monument remains, with MPs like Kasciunas defending it. Apparently, patriotism washes away the stain of Holocaust perpetration.

 

Fundamental to any democracy is an honest and thorough examination of its past. Lithuanian politicians strive to keep the population in a perpetual state of fear. Their pervasive method is a possible impending Russian invasion (Russian mischief making in the Baltics is a genuine concern). Dissention from their ideological orthodoxy is labeled a Russian plot. They see no reason for self-examination, therefore, questioning the honoring of Holocaust perpetrators constitutes opposing the ideological state. Public support for Soviet or Nazi crimes against Lithuania is criminalized, however, support for Lithuanian Holocaust perpetrators is applauded.

 

A recent example is Dr. Darius Udrys, a Lithuanian-American currently living in Vilnius. Udrys is outspoken in his criticism of Lithuanian officials who honor Nazi collaborators and war criminals. He has proven to be a continual irritant to Lithuania’s historical revisionists. In a recent online discussion, Udrys questioned the propriety of the killing of civilians during Lithuania’s partisan war against the Soviets, and as a result, was forced out of his position as head of the city’s development agency. His ousting was preceded by a public slander campaign led by a Vilnius City Councilmember Adomas Buzinskas and his ideological colleagues. An appeal for redress was presented to the City’s Ethics Commission, who ruled against Udrys, claiming that the slanderer was simply being “patriotic”.

 

Patriotism and honoring of Lithuanian Holocaust perpetrators have become synonymous, as was Jew hate and patriotism in the late 1930s.

 

Lithuania‘s problems with truth will continue to plague it. These problems shock and dismay the Western world, the very bodies that Lithuania hopes will accept them as an equal nation, and come to their defense in the event of a Russian invasion.

 

Grant Gochin is a Wealth Advisor in Los Angeles. He may be reached at grant.gochin@raymondjames.com

 

 

 

 

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Correspondence with the Lithuanian Prime Minister’s Office

Attached is correspondence with the Prime Minister’s Office. This contains four documents:

  1. English language translation of my letter dated October 31, 2017.
  2. Ombudsman response translated into English.
  3. Original letter in Lithuanian – #1 above.
  4. Original letter in Lithuanian – #2 above.

Correspondence with Prime Ministers Office

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Correspondence with the Office of the Seimas Ombudsman

Attached is correspondence with the Office of the Seimas Ombudsman. This contains four documents:

  1. English language translation of my letter dated October 31, 2017.
  2. Ombudsman response translated into English.
  3. Original letter in Lithuanian – #1 above.
  4. Original letter in Lithuanian – #2 above.

The Lithuanian Government sponsors an active disinformation campaign. Here is recent correspondence drawing the Ombudsman’s attention to this ongoing issue.
As they have paid no attention to this issue for the past many years, I expect no attention to be paid this time either.
The purpose of my efforts are to document that people of conscience stood up for truth, and that future generations of Lithuanians will not be able to say “we didn’t know”.

Office of the Seimas Ombudsman

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Correspondence with the Lithuanian Parliament

Attached is correspondence with the Speaker of the Parliament of Lithuania. This contains four documents:

  1. English language translation of my letter dated October 31, 2017.
  2. Parliamentary response translated into English.
  3. Original letter in Lithuanian – #1 above.
  4. Original letter in Lithuanian – #2 above.

Seimas – Parliament of Lithuania correspondence

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Letter to President Grybauskaite

On November 14, 2017, my lawyers submitted the attached letter to President Grybauskaite.
An English language translation is first, the original in Lithuanian language follows.

I have no expectation of truth from the Lithuanian Government, my objective in issuing these letters is to record that the Government was fully aware of the situation, and is protecting those perpetrating these issues.

This record is created for future generations of Lithuanians.

President Grybauskaite Nov 14 2017

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized